European Monetary Institute EMI. 3rd annual 1996 Report
1997/2057(COS)
The rapporteur, Mr Roberto MEZZAROMA, congratulated Mr LAMFALUSSY, as he neared the
end of his term of office, on setting up the European Monetary Institute (EMI) and quickly
making it operational.
As regards the macro-economic framework, he was worried by the weak relationship in the
European Union between GDP growth, employment and unemployment and regretted that the
EMI analysis blamed this situation on "rigidities in labour markets", while ignoring other
significant factors such as low investment, lack of purchasing power, little research and
technological innovation, lack of educational and learning systems etc.
Noting that a large number of Member States already meet many of the requirements for
economic and monetary union, the rapporteur considers that the decision on which Member
States can participate in economic and monetary union should take full account of the tendential
and lasting nature of convergence developments.
As far as preparations for stage three are concerned, the rapporteur reiterated that the European
Union's monetary policy could not be divorced from its economic policy, which was based on
close coordination between the economic policies of the Member States. He noted with surprise
that numerous Member States have still not fully satisfied the provisions of the Treaty relating to
the independence of the national central banks.
He trusted that proper use would be made of the EMI missions designed to safeguard cooperation
between the central banks and expressed his concern with respect to the implementation of the
information and communication systems needed in order to carry out the operational functions of
monetary policy within the ESCB. Similarly, the rapporteur trusted that relations between the
EMI and the various international financial bodies would be consolidated as quickly as possible.
As far as relations with the European Parliament were concerned, he reiterated the importance
which he attached to genuine democratic monitoring of EMU policy and the need to start
planning how to consolidate future relations with the ECB. The rapporteur did not feel that it
made sense to draw up a convergence report in 1997 on the basis of the economic data for 1996,
as provided for in the Treaty, because misunderstandings and uncertainty might arise.�