ECB annual report for 2010
2011/2156(INI)
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted
the own-initiative report drafted by Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
(ADLE, ES) on the ECB Annual Report for 2010.
Article 282 of the TFEU states that the primary
objective of the ECB is to maintain price stability and that
the ECB should support general economic policies to help achieve
it, and also notes the work by the ESRB under the auspices of the
ECB on financial stability. The committee welcomes the fact that so
far the ECB has been remarkably successful in maintaining HICP
inflation at close to 2% despite a number of macro-financial shocks
and volatile commodity prices and at a time when average GDP growth
has been low in the Union.
Members express concern at the effect of interest
rate increases on economic growth in the euro area.
The report emphasises that the repurchasing of
bonds on secondary markets is justified by the aim of restoring
a monetary policy which functions effectively, during this period
of exceptional malfunctioning of certain sectors of the market. It
notes that these repurchasing programmes are complemented by
programmes neutralising liquidity.
Members believe in the strength of the euro area
economy and in the importance of the euro as an international
currency. They are deeply alarmed at the persistence of the renewed
financial turmoil in the EU and the persistence of substantial
macro-financial imbalances between the euro area economies and
deflationary pressures in many euro-area Member States. They are
concerned about global monetary developments and the external value
of the euro, as non-conventional liquidity injections in most OECD
countries have significant spillover effects. They believe that
much stronger international coordination is required to make the
global monetary system more stable.
The Commission is invited to :
set up a European credit rating foundation
and evaluate the pros and cons of temporarily
suspending credit ratings for countries following an EU/IMF
adjustment programme; deplores, further, the current credit rating
oligopoly and calls for measures to boost competition among rating
agencies and increase the number of such agencies;
take the steps needed to establish a European
Monetary Fund and so ensure that the IMF will not need to be
involved in Europes future credit policy, thereby reducing
the Member States dependence on other international
institutions and markets.
The ECB is called upon to introduce as part of the
Security Markets Programme a discount rate mechanism that can be
adjusted if a given security is further downgraded by most credit
rating agencies, with a view to ensuring that the ECB does not end
up with too many risky assets. Members take the view that in the
current emergency there is an urgent need to define and disclose
additional strict conditions attaching to ECB liquidity provisions,
including prudential conditions which go beyond internal and
non-disclosed rules and haircuts linked to the collateral accepted
for its refinancing operations.
Crisis management: the
report welcomes the determined and proactive stance taken by the
ECB throughout the crisis since 2007 and, more recently, in the
summer 2011 when some major EU economies were in difficulties in
the face of continued indecisiveness on the part of the Member
States, an attitude which is pushing the ECB into taking on an
overtly political role in response to the current debt crisis.
Members note that monetary policy must take a share of the
responsibility for the creation of asset bubbles.
The report deplores the lack of an adequate EU
economic policy framework for crisis management and the
hesitant management of the crisis by the Commission and the Member
States, particularly those in which reforms are needed. It urges
the Council and the Commission rapidly to put forward the
comprehensive and far-reaching measures required to safeguard
the stability of the euro.
Members emphasise that given the lack of a proper euro
area crisis framework the ECB was pushed to take risks not covered
by its mandate. They acknowledge the need for non-standard monetary
policy measures and notes their temporary nature, but call for a
those programmes to be phased out as soon as the financial markets
have stabilised and the sovereign debt crisis has been resolved and
provided that a Community framework is established to deal properly
with financial instability. Moreover, they call for measures to
establish more integrated economic governance.
Economic and financial governance: the report calls for macro-prudential supervision
of the financial system which is better integrated into the
monetary policy context and which takes account of differences
between euro area and non-euro area countries. It calls for a
significant increase in the resources available for the new
financial supervisory architecture in order to increase its
effectiveness. It also stresses the need for:
a single European Minister of Finance, possibly
drawn from the Commission, in keeping with the proposal made by
Jean-Claude Trichet in Aachen on 2 June 2011; the issue of the
democratic legitimacy of such a proposal must be properly
addressed;
a single European Treasury to relieve the ECB
of its quasi-fiscal role; takes the view that this European
Treasury could be established by means of a change to the EU
Treaty;
a quick implementation and application of the
provisions of the economic governance package; in that
connection, Members call for the consistent and balanced
application of the European Stability and Growth Pact and an
automatic mechanism for the imposition of sanctions on countries
which run budget deficits.
Lastly, the report recommends that the ECB enhance the
transparency of its work in order to increase its legitimacy and
predictability. Members reiterate its long-standing call for the
summaries of minutes of meetings of the Governing Council to be
made public. They welcome the ECB's commitment to its
accountability to the European Parliament and stresses the very
constructive role played by the ECB at the highest level and
through its staff in the codecision procedure.