Quality assurance in higher education: European cooperation
1997/0121(SYN)
In its common position on the Council recommendation on cooperation in quality assurance in
higher education, the Council has taken account of the spirit of most of the amendments proposed
by Parliament at first reading (13 amendments of the 38 adopted). These are the amendments which
are primarily concerned with the issue of diversity of national cultures concerning evaluation, the
definition of a higher education establishment and the impact on higher education of the information
society and economic and technological developments. The Council, like Parliament, stresses the
importance of transnational mobility for quality education and the importance of quality education
for employment. It has also adopted the idea of a link between the socio-cultural and economic
functions of education. Other important amendments have been incorporated such as those on the
exclusive responsibility of Member States for the organization and structure of higher education
systems and on autonomy of universities.
Apart from the amendments which were not incorporated by the Commission in its modified
proposal, the Council has not adopted some more technical amendments on the education and
research mandate of higher education establishments, the expansion and completion of existing
structures for the creation of a 'European quality assurance network' and examples of exchanges of
information, experience and/or assistance. At the same time, the Council has made some changes
to the Commission's basic text and modified the general structure of the initial text by reinforcing
the elements of the proposal concerned with 'cooperation between Member States and weakening
the role of the Commission.
In particular, the Council considered that the detailed request addressed to the Commission to
support the establishment of a European quality assurance network was not appropriate. It proposes
to transfer this part of the text to Part 1, addressed solely to the Member States. The follow-up
measures needed after a teaching quality evaluation also apply exclusively to educational
establishments. The new recommendations to the Commission are concerned with intra-Community
cooperation in the area of quality assurance (in close cooperation with the Member States and on the
basis of existing programmes) and on progress reports carried out in this area. The Council also
considered that it was more appropriate to transfer to the annex the principles on which national
evaluation and quality assurance systems should be based. The provisions concerning the evaluation
procedure itself have been relaxed to take into account the needs of higher education establishments.
The Council has omitted a paragraph providing for the Commission to submit appropriate proposals
to strengthen quality assurance.
�