Resaerch RTD, 5th framework-programme EC 1998-2002: research, technological development and demonstration activities
1997/0119(COD)
By adopting Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL's (EPP, D) recommendation for
second reading, the Committee will propose that Parliament rejects
Council's common position on the EC Fifth Framework Programme for research,
technological development and demonstration activities 1998-2002.
(Co-decision procedure, second reading). The rapporteur received the full
backing of the Committee by demanding an overall budget of ECU 16.300
million (the EURATOM programme included), while Council had proposed only
ECU 14.000 million. It was generally felt yesterday that a conciliation
procedure later this year would be unavoidable. In order to strenghthen
Parliament's position, compromises between the various political groups
have been negotiated.
In its revised proposal of 14 January 1998, the European Commission had
also proposed ECU 16.300 million as the overall amount for the EC and the
Euratom programmes. The maximum overall amount without Euratom will be ECU
15.400 million. A rejection of the common position would create
considerable problems between the Council and the European Parliament in
their respective roles as the' budget authority of the Union. At present,
their different proposals are as follows:
Council's commmon position (*)........ EP Committee position (*)
Indirect actions.... ECU million..... Indirect actions Ecu million
1st activity........... 10.039 ....... 1st activity....... 12.000
2nd activity............ 458 ....... 2nd activity....... 500
3rd activity............ 350 ....... 3rd activity....... 420
4th activity............ 1.205 ....... 4th activity....... 1.320
Direct actions....... 668 ....... Direct actions..... 800
(see below)
Maximum overall amount 12.740 .... Maximum overall amount 15.040
(*)Euratom not included
The Committe also took on board compromise amendments on optimizing the
scientific and technological conditions for the international
competitiveness of the EU, by using the EU Structural Funds, the European
Investment Bank and the European Investment Funds, on the Joint Research
Centre and by including coal among the key actions of the first activity.
Another amendment suggested the introduction of a European Grand Prix for
scientific and technological research.