Education, training, research: the obstacles to transnational mobility. Green Paper
1996/2198(COS)
OBJECTIVE: This Green Paper relates to the obstacles to transnational mobility in education,
training and research in the Community. After considering these obstacles, the Commission proposes
several lines of action for eliminating them, on which it is to consult all the players concerned over
a six-month period.
SUBSTANCE: The abolition of obstacles to the free movement of people is one of the basic
objectives of the Community. Without it, it is not possible to speak of a European social area.
Mobility is also one of the responses to current economic change and its consequences in relation
to employment.
In its Green Paper, the Commission is committed to demonstrating that, although demand for
mobility continues to grow (the number of students benefiting from the Erasmus programme has
risen from 3000 in 1987/88 to 170 000 in 1995/96), it has to be acknowledged that there are still too
many obstacles to mobility.
Five major obstacles have been identified:
- an obstacle to transnational training of the unemployed: e.g. an unemployed person undergoing
training in another Member State loses his rights to unemployment benefit if the training lasts longer
than three months.
The line of action proposed by the Commission consists in extending so as to cover unemployed
persons in training Community legislation that allows job searching in another Member State for six
months at least without a loss of rights and ensuring the continued right to unemployment benefits
for the unemployed undergoing training in another Member State;
- Statutory problems for trainees and young people doing voluntary work: e.g. a student wishing
to take up a traineeship in a company in another Member State cannot find a host company, as
legislation in that Member State considers him as an employee, and the company would be
responsible for the social charges accordingly; a graduate undergoing unpaid traineeship in another
Member State is not covered by Community-level coordination of social security systems because
he is classed neither as a worker nor as a member of a worker's family. This lack of specific legal
category means that he has no rights as regards social security and can sometimes lead to problems
with rights of residence if the training takes more than three months. Volunteers find themselves in
a similar situation if they do voluntary work for more than three months in another Member State,
as their position is not recognized.
The line of action proposed is to establish a legal framework for the situation of trainees and
volunteers within the EU;
- territorial restriction of student grants: students entitled to grants lose them if they pursue their
studies in another Member State.
Line of action proposed: Remove the territoriality of grants;
- the fiscal arrangements for research grants: Community research grants are implemented
differently across the Community, depending on the status given to the researchers by the host
country (student, employee or self-employed). This leads to divergent fiscal arrangements and
affects researcher mobility (certain Member States deduct up to 50% of the value of the grant).
Line of action proposed: apply the same rules to Community funded researchers in all Member
States, either by exempting grants or by coordinating the rules applied in the Member States);
- problems of mutual recognition of academic and vocational training: grant holders wishing to
undergo training in a Member State other than their own find that the qualifications they acquire are
not recognized in their countries of origin.
Line of action proposed: move towards mutual recognition of placements and vocational training
courses and extend the European credit transfer system (ECTS) already established in higher
education to cover the vocational training sector.
There are other obstacles, such as:
- weaknesses in foreign language skills;
- the financial position of the less well-off, for whom access to mobility is less easy;
- access of legally resident third-country nationals to education and training activities in a
Member State other than their host country.
Lastly, the Green Paper emphasizes the urgent need for a large-scale information campaign on the
issue of mobility: information for citizens and for public authorities, who are not always aware of
the rules that apply to transnational mobility.
�