Agenda 2000: raw tobacco, reform of the common organisation of the market COM (amend. regul. 2075/92/EEC)
1998/0027(CNS)
OBJECTIVE: to reform the COM in tobacco, in particular to better adapt supply to demand through
greater flexibility in premiums.
SUBSTANCE: in accordance with the conclusions of the Commission report on the common
organization of the market in the raw tobacco sector (see COS 0527), a new regulation is proposed
to reform the sector and take account of the report's proposals. The new regulation pursues six
specific objectives:
(1) encouragement of the production of higher quality tobacco: it is proposed to encourage the
production of higher quality tobacco by varying a proportion of the premium granted to each
producer depending on the quality of his produce determined by the purchase price; this system
compares the value of the tobacco produced by all producers within one and the same group; an
amount of 35 to 45% of the premium is variable; a transitional period of three years is provided for
to set up this system;
(2) increasing awareness of public health and environmental concerns: the Commission proposes
to double the size of the deduction from the premium for financing the research fund and information
on tobacco; measures to improve environmental protection would also be funded by the producer
groups by means of the specific aid paid out to them;
(3) enabling producers to convert to other activities: it is proposed to set up a quota buy-back system
for the benefit of producers who decide to leave the sector; this mechanism will involve the
reallocation of resources within the overall budget allocated to the sector, thus facilitating structural
adjustment; it is also intended that tobacco producers who wish to do so should already be able to
benefit from Regulation 2079/92/EEC on early retirement from farming, provided they meet the
conditions laid down in the national implementing regulation;
(4) strengthening supervision: it is proposed to set up a processor approval system to enable Member
States to impose more appropriate penalties for non-compliance with Community law; provision is
made for a number of compulsory checks, such as on individual areas planted;
(5) making the quota system more flexible: it is proposed to make it easier to transfer production
quotas between groups of varieties provided the principle of budgetary neutrality is complied with;
the text also proposes to facilitate the transfer of production quotas between producers; it is also
proposed to introduce an auction system for cultivation contracts, so that contract prices better reflect
market trends;
(6) simplifying administration of the sector: by replacing the present allocation of quotas to
individual producers by a system whereby quotas are distributed to producer groups every three
years, the text also proposes to considerably reduce the number of operations that must be carried
out by the national authorities.
�