1994 discharge: 6th EDF
1996/2050(DEC)
In adopting the report by Mr Terence WYNN (PSE, RU), Parliament noted that the difficulties
characterizing financial management of the EDF could in large part be attributed to the fact
that they are not managed in accordance with regular budgetary provisions, and refused
discharge to the Commission in respect of the management of the sixth EDF for the 1994
financial year. Parliament considered it anomalous that it was called upon to reach an annual
discharge decision for the EDF, without at the same time possessing either the corresponding
budgetary or legislative powers.
It considered that democratic accountability for the expenditure carried out was seriously
compromised and that this situation could no longer be tolerated. It refused from now on to
be implicated in providing any illusion of accountability whereby it might assume responsibility
for a system for which it could not legislate. It called again for the integration of EDF funds
into the development cooperation section of the general budget of the European Communities
and reminded the Member States of their prime responsibility in creating this unsatisfactory
situation.
Whilst recognizing the Commission's attempts to improve EDF financial management within
the existing legal framework, Parliament affirmed its total disagreement with the Commission's
decision to use public funds totalling ECU 738.606 to wind up the ACP's Cultural Foundation,
pay off its creditors and meet its related staff costs. It noted furthermore that the Commission
was under no legal obligation to reach this decision, which was of an exclusively political
nature. It believed that the Commission was able to behave as it did in this matter because
the procedures did not ensure transparency or accountability in respect of the discharge
authority.
�