Competitiveness of the European industry
1996/2230(COS)
In adopting the report by Mr Gérard CAUDRON (PSE, F) on the competitiveness of European
industry, the European Parliament noted the lack of any real chronic sectoral weaknesses, with the
exception of the persistent backwardness in the field of information technology and, to a lesser extent,
biotechnology. It observed, nonetheless, that despite its considerable diversified and complementary
research potential, Europe was achieving mediocre results in the area of innovation, which was
reflected in its decline in the patents sector.
Parliament called on the Commission to draw up proposals laying the foundations for a genuine
European industrial policy based, in particular, on incentives for public and private investment, the
introduction of aid mechanisms for innovative, job creating and/or restructuring industries, and the
development of venture capital. It firmly supported the principle of coordinating and harmonising
fiscal policies.
It believed that public spending on industrial research should be geared more to commercial
applications and encouraged the creation of European structures, whether private, public or joint in
origin, capable of bringing industrial partners together in major research cooperation projects. It
called for the adoption of the European company statute as a decisive step towards recognising the
European dimension of business.
It believed that the introduction of minimum social and environmental clauses in bilateral and
multilateral world trade was essential in order to combat social and environmental dumping. It called
for better coordination and certification of products marketed within the EU. While recognising the
impact of environmental requirements on competitiveness as a factor which stimulated research, it
also acknowledged that environmental constraints were a significant financial burden which was
acceptable only if competitors were likewise subject to them. Parliament considered that it must be
possible for labour markets to adjust and accompany the development of society and that the long-
term economic and social impact of the initiatives to reduce working time adopted in the various
Member States should be analysed.�